Unfortunately, Booker has made some decisions prior to the drowning. Booker's death does not create a paradox because it does not affect anything else. https://www.ign.com/videos/2013/03/27/bioshock-infinite-post-credits-scene It doesn't matter if Booker continues to live, because it already happened ("dies, died, will die). The death of the DeWitt of Infinite means that the eventuality of a Comstock becomes impossible, nullifying his influence on the multiverse. - Taken from the Wikipedia page for Temporal Paradox. The person made both decisions, became wealthy through fast lottery winnings and through a kind deed. Once all possibilites of Comstock's "birth" are gone, that's it. Part 1: Chip ‘n’ Dale, What you should know about viral outbreaks. Everything that is happening, has happened, and will ever happen, is happening right now, but in a different universe - an infinite amount of universes, for that matter. Now that we have an understanding of what a multiverse is all about, we can explain what BioShock Infinite was trying to accomplish with the story, that, if understood, is a pretty good one. He will start to hear a mobile’s music play softly and can get up to investigate. Temporal paradox (also known as time paradox and time travel paradox) is a theoretical paradoxical situation that happens because of time travel. The simplest explanation I can come up with is that because Infinite's story is (as far as I can work out) exclusively to do with timelines that derived from Booker going to the baptism, the end scene could simply be from a dimension where Booker never went to the baptism at all and still had a wife and child, which seems entirely possible given that there are "infinite universes". We cannot say for sure, as the origin of Elizabeth's powers is simply explained with a hand wave of being in two places at once, and the game doesn't delve deeply into this. Does PostgreSQL always sequentially scan pages in the same order? What exactly limits the signal frequency on transmission lines? While logically consistent in that in this version of events nothing happened outside of Booker's dream, this would be a deeply unsatisfying ending, and robs the rest of the narrative of much of its power. Effectively the "it was all a dream" ending. I really like AProughs answer how the post credits show no matter what the Lutece twins do, the drowning of Booker fails in the end and the circle keeps going. Elizabeth kills Booker before he makes a final decision. The first paradox we see is the state of being alive or dead, which affects Chen Lin, Booker, Lady Comstock, and two guards. Well, at this point, Elizabeth has the ability to open any tear she wants and can access the infinite doors that lead to different timelines. The question of what changes might Booker Dewitt face if he were to be baptized, and how those changes in one man might effect the lives of those around him, even the world. We all know that Booker became Comstock because in one universe he chose to accept the baptism. Here's what the major events of Bioshock Infinite (and the ones that preceded it) would look like if time were linear. Well, this is to show how Anna's plan ultimately failed. How is this possible given that about-to be-baptised-booker drowned himself, therefore removing any possible strain of Colombia or Comstock to exist? This signifies that Booker has merged with his younger self, starting again at the baptism scene. But if he died, there's no one to kill him, so he doesn't die, so Elizabeth gets born and kills him....now you see the loop? But what if they had not turned left? After the Credits. My interpretation of the final scene then, is that it happens in one of those universes where there was no baptism attempt. I don't even know xD. The last words before the drowning are: We can be reasonably certain therefore that Booker's drowning wipes out all of the Comstock and DeWitt timelines, because it happens before the fatal choice. Might the one who came into their wealth more slowly feel compelled to give the poor version of themselves a second chance at wealth? It is not long, but it changes your perspective on the end of the game. Elizabeth kills Booker, but that is not the constant. But some will still work around to getting there. Well, that's not entirely true. We never know, it fades to black. ...I've come up with a theory that could explain the ending a little better: within the Bioshock world/universe/whatever you want to call it, paradoxes are impossible. Again, we have a special case where Elizabeth's power over the tears allow her to retain her identity and memory. I would say either it's a Booker in a universe where he never went to the Baptism (as said above), though the "dream" idea is also possible I think. At some point in the time leading up to the start of the story, Booker Dewitt decided that to wash away the sins of his past he would get baptized. This is proved at about 15:45 in this video. Examples of back of envelope calculations leading to good intuition? What I think that means is that the Baptism is NOT that inevitable point in Bookers life. A common ailment is that people will end up feeling traumatized and deeply disoriented, often seen struggling with their deaths. Is it possible to afford the Bucking Bronco vigor at the fair? The Booker in the after-credits scene is, IMO, one of those Bookers that diverged from "our" Booker prior to the drowning. There's a hundred ways you can interpret the post credits further but here are my guesses. Booker's situation is a special case as he is actually stepping into another universe. If Booker cannot choose to become Comstock, then the only option is to stay in his current state (i.e. How to highlight "risky" action by its icon, and make it stand out from other icons? The DeWitt we see in the post credits scene has no debt to Comstock because there is no affiliation between him and the Lutece twins so Anna cannot become Elizabeth and the renegade cannot manifest. When he is killed, he is still in the process of deciding. Booker Dewitt wakes up in his office after we see him having drowned at the baptism. It is up to the player to decide if Booker succeeded in stopping the creation of Columbia by his alternate self, thereby never bringing about the events he went through in the game, or… What if Elizabeth is not there? And that is where things get… complicated. The game plays with the idea that one particular event in your life is inevitable and only the choices you make after determine the outcomes. Here is what the events of Bioshock Infinite look like as an "ocean". This Booker is from a timeline where he never went to the baptism ceremony at all. What it means is that time is not linear; everything happens all at once. You can no longer choose to wear the blue shirt or continue wearing the black shirt. Do I have to say Yes to "have you ever used any other name?" Booker is inevitable. The post credits scene is the only scene that could ever manifest a real progressive timeline. When you say that Booker rejecting the baptism must lead to an alternative universe Booker accepting it due to the "for every choice there is a universe where it was made" thing?

Meg Meaning In Text, How To Get Metal Team Leader In Save The World, Sims 2 Bon Voyage Mementos Guide, Dior Stussy Font, Sims 2 Plantsim, Bosch Mcm3501mgb Review,