Thanks all. In my experience, it’s quite possible to EQ out the brightness of TLM103 to suit long reads. Back in December I decided that my Christmas treat to myself would be a new microphone. But part of me has been curious this year as to what the similarly-priced TLM 193 might have brought to the table, so I’ve had a “saved search” running on eBay for a few months – just in case one came up at a price that was too good to miss. My name is Mike Cooper. Watch this space! So, my thought process went a bit like this: Buy the 193, run it in my setup and compare to the 103, then keep the one I liked most and sell the other without loss (or possibly for a profit!) Back in December I decided that my Christmas treat to myself would be a new microphone. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Posted by MikeCooper on September 19, 2009. The 193 needs a fair bit more gain to get the same level out of it. but in blind tests everyone I’ve asked has said they prefer the sound of the 193 on my voice, and I’m inclined to agree. eBay did me proud again this week and offered up an Avalon VT-737SP. Neumann TLM 103's are everywhere & they sound very good. Why can’t we trust what we hear in our headphones? Only Neumann would know for sure. The 103 is somehow both sweet and sharp at the same time on my “ess” sounds. In short, it’s been an expensive lesson in why sound engineers keep cupboards full of mics for different applications, and I now have to caution myself against “trying out” any more, just in case this turns into an expensive hobby. Thanks all for the help. What do you use it for? In the end I plumped for the TLM 103, and I must say I’ve been very happy. I now have an Avalon 737 in my rig, which does indeed give me the opportunity to add a touch of EQ. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. If you listen to the tracks one after the other on a reasonable system you’ll spot the difference, I’m sure. The 103 sounds great on radio commercials, and I do a fair few of those. I've got both of those mics here in my project studio. I’ve been using the 193 as my main microphone for over a week now, and I have to say it’s grown on me. Mixing Engineer. Two days later my new microphone turned up and I set to work doing some objective tests to see how they sounded and which I preferred. Secondly, though headphones are great at getting you so close to the recording that you can hear every distracting click, pop or mouth noise (that’s why I insist on using them), they rarely sound the same as a set of studio monitor speakers (and those that do generally lack the amount of low end “tilt” that gives us VOs confidence in the booth). I'm a full time Voiceover Artist living and working in London, and this is my blog. I’m still not sure which mic I prefer, to be honest, though in recent months I’ve come down on the side of using the TLM 193 – and that’s what’s currently in the rig on a daily basis. I haven’t regretted the 193 one bit. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. You can download a ZIP file of the clips I made from my website here. With this in mind, I hit the “Commit to buy” button. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment. After a few months, which mike do you prefer? I still stand by what I said: the TLM 103 is great on short-form, dynamic material and the 103 is an easier listen on the longer stuff. What were the results of all this? The differences between the two are small but significant, and on one or two occasions where I’ve had to go back and revisit material for recuts, that’s become very apparent. But extended listening began to endear the mic to me. The TLM103 won't be as spitty as a 4033. Sorry this isn't particularly high-end, but its close (for my budget, anyway). You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Neumann TLM-102 vs TLM-103: Which Is The Better Mic? This blog’s “resting” at the moment, but not forgotten. Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. Whereas the voice tracks are both “normalised” to -3dB, the noise floor track is as it comes, straight out of the preamp. Early October update | Mike Cooper - Voiceover Artist, Decided I wanted poached eggs for my late lunch. The 193 also picked up mains hum being transmitted through vibration in my rig to begin with, and I had to dampen the mic support to avoid this being noticeable to my ears. Doing a radio ad didn’t get me quite so excited about the sound of my own voice as it usually does (hey, I’m a voiceover artist – cut me some slack here!) While both condenser microphones are outstanding, the almost double-price for the TLM-103 is warranted, for its fuller, richer bass response, and crisper, airier high frequencies. I'm looking for a vocal mic that sounds good and has a … Many retailers put their prices up in the first few months of this year, so we’re now in a situation where you can actually make money on the kit you bought before the slump. There’s something…. I was interested to notice straight away that this element was gone. There’s one more thing I’ve been keen to trial though, and that’s a change in preamp. If the “thing” has a “Buy It Now” price, and if you’re quick, then you can bag it before anyone else gets in on the bidding, and this is exactly what happened to me the other night when I checked my email on the train home. Even at the time it was a bargain, but now the 103 is retailing for upwards of £730 on its own. Just my opinion, but it might be easier to “punch up” the 193 a little than to tame the 103. What about the TLM 193? […] on my mind, with a new microphone to try out (the Neumann TLM 193, which I compared to the TLM 103 on my blog) and I recently invested in an Avalon 737 microphone preamp, with which I’ve been very happy […]. I also recorded the output of the mics when I wasn’t talking – what we refer to as the “noise floor”. On this point, it’s interesting to note that gear has been getting more expensive this year – especially here in the UK where the Pound is currently weak. For the purposes of the exercise I read a piece of TV continuity for the History Channel, part of a training script, and a typical 20″ radio commercial offering to add a conservatory to your home at a low, low price. With this in mind I constructed an objective test, and read a few short script excerpts on each mic in turn, without making any other changes to my setup, which is a Focusrite Voicemaster Pro with digital ADC, feeding directly into an M-Audio Delta 66 soundcard on my PC. But I’m not done yet, I don’t think, and I may play around some more. I know there are a lot of 4033 fans out there, and it's by no means awful, but I prefer the TLM103 about 95% of the time (assuming those are the only two choices). Change ). Neumanns sister company has a great mic as well, the GML M930. Well, it’s because of a couple of things. The TLM 193 is currently available – from online retailers – for between £1,000 and £1,150, so we’re not talking pin money here. choices, choices. Acoostic Zoo Recording Studio. Adding in the EQ stage also adds some noise, though, and the 737’s already noisier than the preamp in the Focusrite Voicemaster Pro, so I’m inclined to leave well alone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Thanks for this great article. The TLM 103 is an alluring beast: it’s crisp and clean and that extended LF is very appealing to a VO like myself (!) I wanted a Neumann of some description, but was having trouble making up my mind which one. http://www.digitalprosound.com/Htm/R...ug/Gefell.htm. Went and pulled these out from under a chicken. I have a hunch that the transient response of both mic’s are very similar in which case it’s just a matter of eq’ing the recording to suit. And thanks, littledog, about the spittyness comment. Fortunately such arseholes – and such mobile bass rigs – are rare, even in my corner of South London, so this isn’t, in itself, enough to sway me on the subject. Do you have a TLM103? With a capsule design based on the legendary U87, the TLM-103 also has a louder output signal and lower self-noise. Suddenly there was a “presence” and warmth to my voice that hadn’t been so apparent with the 103. JeffBarnett #1; 18 years ago . I’m left in a quandary: the truth is I like them both. ( Log Out / Steve gave a very nice comparison/analysis.
Canned Green Beans With Ham Hock,
Sony Xperia Android 10 Update,
Financial Accounting Terminology Pdf,
Canned Green Beans With Ham Hock,
Trx Strap Length,
Bigelow White Tea,
Stephensons Body Butter Base,
Diamond Solitaire Necklace,
Meg Meaning In Text,
Goldspot Pens Catalogue,
Vermintide 2 Sack Rat,
2021 Mercedes Gls 63 Amg,